27 lines
967 B
Plaintext
27 lines
967 B
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From mrc at CAC.Washington.EDU Fri Jul 1 16:25:58 2005
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:36 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] SEARCH messagesets
|
|
In-Reply-To: <c23fd75e01463e3eb2e9f93408c5b888@iki.fi>
|
|
References: <c23fd75e01463e3eb2e9f93408c5b888@iki.fi>
|
|
Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.63.0507011621330.17505@pangtzu.panda.com>
|
|
|
|
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Timo Sirainen wrote:
|
|
> If mailbox has 10 messages and client does SEARCH 1:11, is it valid to
|
|
> give a BAD reply as most servers do if the same is done with FETCH, or
|
|
> should it just be treated as 1:10? Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
In my opinion, either is valid.
|
|
|
|
It is an error to reference a non-existent sequence number, but SEARCH
|
|
criteria are arguably not referencing the sequence number but merely
|
|
"searching".
|
|
|
|
-- Mark --
|
|
|
|
http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
|
|
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
|
|
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
|
|
|