wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095133.23059.mbox:2,S

29 lines
974 B
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no Wed Sep 7 07:51:03 2005
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:36 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] SELECT of same mailbox
In-Reply-To: <431EFCCF.9040308@isode.com>
References: <UsPqTMxta5Q38J/4ek2JBA.md5@bluegrass.trish.de>
<431EFCCF.9040308@isode.com>
Message-ID: <ZyvoaJcF7XwqC4Z2SRDvnA.md5@bluegrass.trish.de>
Alexey Melnikov writes:
> Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
>
>> My (strong) preference is that SELECT of a valid mailbox should start
>> a new session, no matter whether it's the same mailbox as the
>> previous one.
>
> I agree. Isode code certainly doesn't check if the new mailbox name is
> the same as the old one.
(That also might not be sufficient. Does Isode have another name for
INBOX? InBoX? users.alexey.inbox?)
Mark - is there any specific reason for the presence of those three
words, ?of another mailbox?? Or can we forget them?
Arnt