wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095107.22911.mbox:2,S

40 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From mrc at CAC.Washington.EDU Fri Jun 1 16:45:43 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:39 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Subscriptions in IMAP
In-Reply-To: <8D664A9D-1676-4E53-87AB-4BBFB64D834A@iki.fi>
References: <alpine.OSX.0.99.0705301048240.11683@pangtzu.panda.com>
<20070530113546.Q27473@orthanc.ca>
<alpine.WNT.0.99.0705301146290.5388@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
<BF01B191-D34E-47DE-A4FB-EAF1CADE4715@apple.com>
<1180563766.32181.2028.camel@hurina>
<alpine.WNT.0.99.0705301555120.2080@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
<8046.1180599490.471444@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
<alpine.OSX.0.99.0705311326310.13729@pangtzu.panda.com>
<3770.1180685763.825922@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
<alpine.OSX.0.99.0706011310460.27093@pangtzu.panda.com>
<8D664A9D-1676-4E53-87AB-4BBFB64D834A@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.0.99.0706011644000.27093@pangtzu.panda.com>
On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Are you planning on updating IMAP4rev1 anytime soon? I joined this list just
> before RFC 3501 was released, so I don't know how the previous revisions have
> started. This and some other things could probably be written a bit
> differently to be more easily understandable. Some things could probably be
> even removed, such as APPEND talking about requiring to preserve 8bit data.
Yes, there will undoubtably be yet another IMAP base specification
Proposed Standard.
This is not a light undertaking. Each revision of the base specification
takes at least a year of work.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.