wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095103.22595.mbox:2,S

21 lines
926 B
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no Wed Mar 25 12:34:56 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:54 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Gmail flags issue, timing-sensitive
In-Reply-To: <20150325132119.Horde.H9br3-icKPf32c5xmMNhdfM@bigworm.curecanti.org>
References: <CAN7dqjCYRb2sbOZS49hiqgrSsfKFTzyT-b5fKHm0U4mBGvDRzA@mail.gmail.com>
<CABa8R6t01i4CMumftDbTdY_xC7WYWLCmh7__Qg+zrsw8dZxHwA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAN7dqjAxtu=k65vF-gshYYiEdMVeJ_j_ZruB2RLQRHTxouRckA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAN7dqjBcK_UZ1uYcT-G=a7N7W=g_JoAXf=kHSL6sz9EmMtc-9g@mail.gmail.com>
<20150325132119.Horde.H9br3-icKPf32c5xmMNhdfM@bigworm.curecanti.org>
Message-ID: <64e2246f-9d64-40bc-b373-ec6a45f6acfb@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Michael M Slusarz writes:
> This is inefficient. But it is perfectly acceptable IMAP.
It's not acceptable: the modseq should change whenever the flags do.
Arnt