wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095216.22920.mbox:2,S

29 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From dave at cridland.net Fri Mar 23 02:35:49 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:38 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] SEARCH restricted to one mailbox? Extensions?
In-Reply-To: <46029DF5.8060801@aol.com>
References: <46029DF5.8060801@aol.com>, <"07Mar12. 152936pst.
57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com> <1173743673.9167.65.camel@hurina>
<45F6A2E4.3060502@aol.com> <45F83CCD.2050808@isode.com>
<45F84311.3080906@aol.com>
<jhC3CqDZvoKAsUpydmv19Q.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
<45F84F27.6080202@aol.com>
Message-ID: <2048.1174642549.442200@Nokia-N800-51>
John Snow wrote:
> If we were to combine the multimailbox search with vfolder, what is
> expected to be used for UIDs in a view the includes multiple
> mailboxes? In the normal vfolder, the UID is the same one that
> exists in the underlying mailbox. But since UIDs are only required
> to be unique within the mailbox, combining multiples and using the
> underlying UID for the message could result in duplicate UIDs. So,
> that's not right.
> snow.
UIDs are not simply unique, but strictly increasing.
In a singly-backed vfolder, the uids can be the same if and only if
messages cannot dynamically appear other than bby delivery.
Dave.