32 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
32 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From witold.krecicki at firma.o2.pl Mon Jun 14 14:30:15 2010
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Witold =?utf-8?q?Kr=C4=99cicki?= <witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:44 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] IMAP MOVE extension
|
|
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1006141354350.662@hsinghsing.panda.com>
|
|
References: <201006110854.37969.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
|
|
<201006142216.41783.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
|
|
<alpine.OSX.2.00.1006141354350.662@hsinghsing.panda.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <201006142330.15547.witold.krecicki@firma.o2.pl>
|
|
|
|
On Monday 14 of June 2010 23:10:14 Mark Crispin wrote:
|
|
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Witold Kr?cicki wrote:
|
|
> Nor have I heard any client implementor ask for a move command in IMAP
|
|
> once they are made aware of the substantial error conditions that they
|
|
> would have to recognize and implement in their client. It's so easy for a
|
|
> server author (or protocol extension proposer) to lie and say that these
|
|
> error conditions do not exist.
|
|
Then why it exists in Tb?
|
|
|
|
> The only mail store that could implement MOVE atomically is a database
|
|
> that was poorly-designed so that COPY is slow and MOVE is fast.
|
|
So the correct design of a database is that MOVE is slow and COPY is fast?
|
|
iiinteresting....
|
|
--
|
|
Witold Kr?cicki
|
|
|
|
Grupa o2 Sp??ka z o.o., ul. Jutrzenki 177, 02-231 Warszawa,
|
|
KRS 0000140518, S?d Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy,
|
|
Kapita? zak?adowy 377.298,00 z?., NIP 521-31-11-513
|
|
|