32 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
32 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From tss at iki.fi Mon Mar 12 17:54:48 2007
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:38 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] SEARCH restricted to one mailbox? Extensions?
|
|
In-Reply-To: <07Mar12.161606pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
|
|
References: <07Mar12.152936pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
|
|
<1173743673.9167.65.camel@hurina>
|
|
<07Mar12.161606pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <1173747288.9167.110.camel@hurina>
|
|
|
|
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 17:16 -0700, Bill Janssen wrote:
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
> Yep, that's what I was thinking. I think I'd keep one message in it
|
|
> -- not sure how empty folders are regarded by clients.
|
|
|
|
I don't think there are any problems with empty mailboxes.
|
|
|
|
> Is there an out-of-band way of announcing a new mailbox?
|
|
|
|
Sending an untagged * LIST reply (and LSUB maybe). I doubt there are
|
|
many (any?) clients that pick it up though.
|
|
|
|
-------------- next part --------------
|
|
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
|
|
Name: signature.asc
|
|
Type: application/pgp-signature
|
|
Size: 196 bytes
|
|
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
|
|
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20070313/dc6606da/attachment.sig>
|