wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095149.23059.mbox:2,S

28 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From MRC at CAC.Washington.EDU Wed Sep 7 12:31:28 2005
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:36 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] SELECT of same mailbox
In-Reply-To: <20596.1126120360.592254@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
References: <UsPqTMxta5Q38J/4ek2JBA.md5@bluegrass.trish.de>
<5b93232d050907075812659c02@mail.google.com>
<5b93232d05090708031a898592@mail.google.com>
<Pine.OSX.4.63.0509070901430.28350@pangtzu.panda.com>
<20596.1126120360.592254@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0509071224070.3496@Shimo-Tomobiki.panda.com>
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Dave Cridland wrote:
> Personally I like it. It means that where I need to perform an UNSELECT, but
> the server doesn't support that, I can issue a known bogus SELECT. (In fact,
> I do: SELECT "&#-&#/#")
The entire reason why UNSELECT was defined is that this is not a reliable
mechanism.
-- Mark --
http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.