63 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
63 lines
3.1 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From Hagedorn at spinfo.uni-koeln.de Wed Oct 31 03:21:46 2007
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Sebastian Hagedorn <Hagedorn@spinfo.uni-koeln.de>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:40 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] re: GMail
|
|
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.0.9999.0710291757440.3152@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washignton.EDU>
|
|
References: <alpine.WNT.0.9999.0710241938220.520@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
|
|
<fc2c80ae0710270911o23f0b366g942b2956ac3fa@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
<alpine.WNT.0.9999.0710270924180.4788@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
|
|
<5202.1193523708.069559@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
|
|
<alpine.OSX.0.9999.0710271708460.11181@pangtzu.panda.com>
|
|
<1193531029.25921.561.camel@hurina>
|
|
<alpine.WNT.0.9999.0710271748490.204456@Ningyo-no-Mori.Panda.COM>
|
|
<RMRLrFbL0dA92HCVkk6Cgw.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
|
|
<alpine.OSX.0.9999.0710280923190.11181@pangtzu.panda.com>
|
|
<d1klUHoFkFbXOtQmbn1Bww.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
|
|
<47263322.7040702@psaux.com>
|
|
<1193689139.25921.618.camel@hurina> <472653EE.9080102@psaux.com>
|
|
<alpine.WNT.0.9999.0710291450130.3152@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washignton.EDU>
|
|
<D24F4660-40CA-4114-8E3A-A74CFA9CECAB@apple.com>
|
|
<alpine.WNT.0.9999.0710291546390.3152@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washignton.EDU>
|
|
<6C7F3125-8B6A-471F-A3B4-29AC2C84C1E7@iki.fi>
|
|
<alpine.WNT.0.9999.0710291757440.3152@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washignton.EDU>
|
|
Message-ID: <D90B4BA597E20367614D7411@tyrion.rrz.uni-koeln.de>
|
|
|
|
--On 29. Oktober 2007 17:59:42 -0700 Mark Crispin <MRC@cac.washington.edu>
|
|
wrote:
|
|
|
|
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
|
|
>> A lot of people
|
|
>> want shared mailboxes and besides administrator configuring them
|
|
>> manually ACL is the only possibility. Clients don't currently have much
|
|
>> support for it, but it doesn't really need support from normal clients.
|
|
>> Just having some special "ACL (web)client" is enough. I hoped to have
|
|
>> implemented ACL for my server this summer, but looks like it didn't
|
|
>> happen.
|
|
>
|
|
> I'm not convinced that this needs to be part of IMAP as opposed to an
|
|
> external facility (such as you note is already done).
|
|
>
|
|
>> I think quota is already pretty widely supported by clients, although in
|
|
>> very limited form. If people have quota, they really want to know how
|
|
>> much they have left (when they've reached the limit once..). Quota root
|
|
>> is a pretty weird concept though and I don't think clients handle
|
|
>> multiple ones well. Maybe QUOTA2 extension could do a better job with
|
|
>> those.
|
|
>
|
|
> I don't think that many IMAP clients (as opposed to webmails) report
|
|
> quota. Again, this seems to be an external facility.
|
|
|
|
If those extensions didn't already exist, you would have a point. They
|
|
could've been created as external facilities. But I don't see what taking
|
|
them out of IMAP now would achieve. The claimed dichotomy between IMAP
|
|
clients and webmail doesn't really exist, because those webmailers are IMAP
|
|
clients too. They may not be exemplary ones, but they're what many of our
|
|
users prefer.
|
|
--
|
|
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Geb?ude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
|
|
Zentrum f?r angewandte Informatik - Universit?tsweiter Service RRZK
|
|
.:.Universit?t zu K?ln / Cologne University - ? +49-221-478-5587.:.
|
|
.:.:.:.Skype: shagedorn.:.:.:.
|
|
|