wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095121.22983.mbox:2,S

29 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From mrc at CAC.Washington.EDU Thu Aug 3 11:18:17 2006
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:37 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] IMAP/Pine List query
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSX.4.64.0608031111040.408@pangtzu.panda.com>
References: <089601c6b713$60732ba0$8710e0c3@ftgate.lan>
<Pine.OSX.4.64.0608030959370.408@pangtzu.panda.com>
<GLVU3AykpxJLiEjGrlFisg.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
<Pine.OSX.4.64.0608031111040.408@pangtzu.panda.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.64.0608031117340.408@pangtzu.panda.com>
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Mark Crispin wrote:
> You also missed the point of my comment; I asked Richard if his mail store
> did not have INBOX. I asked because he said that he felt that no untagged
> LIST results should be returned for "tag LIST INBOX %", yet his hierarchy had
> /inbox which suggested that there was, indeed, a mailbox that has the role of
> INBOX in his server.
That, in turn, means that his server should have INBOX, regardless of
whether there is this other name of /inbox that can access that data.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.