wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095112.22903.mbox:2,S

26 lines
820 B
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From tss at iki.fi Sun Jul 22 21:26:23 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:40 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Unordered FETCH replies
Message-ID: <1185164783.25618.157.camel@hurina>
Has anyone tried how badly clients would break if FETCH didn't send
replies ordered by the sequence number? So for example:
1 fetch 1:* body.peek[]
* 3 FETCH (BODY.PEEK[] "")
* 1 FETCH (BODY.PEEK[] "")
* 2 FETCH (BODY.PEEK[] "")
1 OK
I guess this is a bad idea.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20070723/2024e1b4/attachment.sig>