wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095111.22938.mbox:2,S

38 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no Mon Jan 1 16:22:23 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:38 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] reporting/detecting expunged messages
In-Reply-To: <077244CE-5AA8-4524-9A77-27E14C934F84@iki.fi>
References: <4505F2FE.8090807@sun.com>
<Pine.WNT.4.65.0609111648410.5544@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
<450713AB.4090601@sun.com>
<Pine.WNT.4.65.0609121316280.2164@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
<45071A57.5080406@sun.com>
<9SYO8YZNXU3qj9EYGtuGNg.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
<Pine.WNT.4.65.0609121437140.2164@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
<2xKZXsAOqJTXDcZB/xUw7g.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
<Pine.WNT.4.65.0609141841560.1540@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU>
<LWKbk3lpdVhtHUTm38BDeA.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
<A3CFCE55-56CC-4CC1-ACD8-410341B7157C@iki.fi>
<w1EVhSzZvq4UsaZIKe/RlA.md5@[192.168.1.104]>
<077244CE-5AA8-4524-9A77-27E14C934F84@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <nkinvq2thhZkY7LL5u4HSQ.md5@[192.168.1.104]>
Timo Sirainen writes:
> What was the problem with 4.1.3 anyway? Cyrus seems to be using it, so
> it can't be that bad either.
I don't think 4.1.3 is terrible.
I chose 4.1.2+loopbreaker because 4.1.3 makes msg-att-static less than
entirely static, which I'd rather avoid if I have a decent alternative.
I cannot point to any concrete ill effects. Call it cargo-cultish
adherence to design principles.
(What a pity that 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 don't specify a resp-text-code to let
smart clients identify the problem exactly.)
Arnt