wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095108.22920.mbox:2,S

77 lines
2.8 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From janssen at parc.com Thu Mar 8 11:25:40 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Bill Janssen <janssen@parc.com>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:38 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] question on BODY[n.MIME]?
Message-ID: <07Mar8.112542pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
I'm watching Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 do bad things with a home-grown
(from RFC 3501) IMAP server. I think our (mine and Thunderbird's)
understanding of the BODY[MIME] request might differ...
It seems that Thunderbird expects BODY[n.MIME] to return the entire
MIME part, while I think the spec says to return only a set of
headers, and only those headers specified in the MIME spec
("Content-Type", "MIME-Version", "Content-Transfer-Encoding",
"Content-Id", and "Content-Description"). In any case, TBird
seems to be building the message which it displays using the
headers as the body content!
Here's what I see on the wire:
It first fetches the BODYSTRUCTURE of the message, which in this
example has the UID 13. I've added a few newlines/spaces to make this
easier to read, but they aren't in the original. All lines are CR-LF
terminated. The {count} includes the CR-LFs.
C: 10 uid fetch 13 (bodystructure)
S: * 13 FETCH (bodystructure (("text" "plain" () NIL NIL "7BIT" 299 7)
("application" "pdf" ("name" "The_Noguchi_Filing_System.pdf") NIL NIL "base64" 824399)
"mixed" ("boundary" "13.0.xxx.xxxx.xxxx.4232.1161192893.766.2")) UID 13)
S: 10 OK UID FETCH completed
Thunderbird then fetches the header information (again, I've elided
some of it, and added some whitespace to make it easier to read):
C: 11 UID fetch 13 (BODY[HEADER] BODY[1.MIME] BODY[2.MIME])
S: * 13 FETCH (BODY[header] {1306}
Return-Path: [...]
Delivery-Date: Wed Oct 18 10:40:18 2006
Received: [...]
Received: [...]
Received: [...]
Received: [...]
Received: [...]
Received: [...]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="13.0.xxx.xxx.xxxx.4232.1161192893.766.2"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: The Noguchi Filing System
To: [...]
From: janssen@parc.com
Message-Id: <06Oct18.103519pdt."511362(2)"@alpha.xerox.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:35:13 PDT
X-PARC-Posted: "Wed, Oct 18 10:35:26 2006 PDT7" <uir>
X-PARC-Posted: "Wed, Oct 18 10:36:09 2006 PDT7" <uironly>
BODY[1.mime] {28}
Content-Type: text/plain
BODY[2.mime] {104}
Content-Type: application/pdf; name=The_Noguchi_Filing_System.pdf
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
UID 13)
S: 11 OK UID FETCH completed
Am I misunderstanding the meaning of BODY[1.MIME], and sending back
the wrong data?
In this system, the mailbox message sequence numbers are the same as
the message UID numbers, so that's why you're seeing the same value in
both places. By the way, are there pitfalls with that design I'm not
seeing?
Bill