38 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
38 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From mrc at CAC.Washington.EDU Fri Apr 6 09:16:00 2007
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:39 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] RENAME Inbox
|
|
In-Reply-To: <46166C0B.9080308@andrew.cmu.edu>
|
|
References: <46166C0B.9080308@andrew.cmu.edu>
|
|
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.0.98.0704060913190.10346@pangtzu.panda.com>
|
|
|
|
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Ken Murchison wrote:
|
|
> I don't want to start another holy over whether we need to drop RENAME, but I
|
|
> have a couple of questions regarding the intended/expected behavior of RENAME
|
|
> Inbox.
|
|
|
|
If IMAP5 ever happens, I will insist that RENAME is dropped. Nobody
|
|
implements it correctly.
|
|
|
|
> - I assume that \Seen state should follow the messages, just like any other
|
|
> RENAME, correct?
|
|
|
|
I think so.
|
|
|
|
> - Should mailbox annotations be copied or moved to the new mailbox?
|
|
|
|
I think that they move with the mailbox.
|
|
|
|
> - Should the UIDVALIDITY, UIDNEXT, HIGHESTMODESEQ, etc of the Inbox be reset?
|
|
> In other words, should Inbox look like it has been freshly CREATEd?
|
|
|
|
I think so, since a freshly-CREATEd INBOX is the intended effect.
|
|
|
|
-- Mark --
|
|
|
|
http://panda.com/mrc
|
|
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
|
|
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
|
|
|