22 lines
889 B
Plaintext
22 lines
889 B
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From dkarp at zimbra.com Fri Jun 11 07:40:39 2010
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Dan Karp <dkarp@zimbra.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:43 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] IMAP MOVE extension
|
|
In-Reply-To: <1276266450.22134.92.camel@kurkku.sapo.corppt.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <1768814180.483.1276267238967.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
|
|
|
|
> > Still - is it worth the effort?
|
|
>
|
|
> I don't currently see it being worth the trouble. Maybe I'll implement
|
|
> it some day, but only if my employer wants it.
|
|
|
|
If other folks are serious about this, I'd be happy to implement a
|
|
MOVE command in our IMAP server. It's minimal new code for us, and
|
|
it'd be significantly more performant than COPY/STORE/EXPUNGE.
|
|
|
|
Incidentally, Mark's stated reason for avoiding a MOVE op in baseline
|
|
IMAP was that it would be the only operation to require locking >1
|
|
mailbox simultaneously. Or so I recall.
|
|
|