21 lines
843 B
Plaintext
21 lines
843 B
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From johnl-imap at iecc.com Sun Mar 15 19:39:57 2015
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: John Levine <johnl-imap@iecc.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:54 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] DKIM signatures on this list
|
|
In-Reply-To: <4d3ef14f-8f48-498c-8352-2d6f6a9c11a4@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
|
|
Message-ID: <20150316023957.32209.qmail@ary.lan>
|
|
|
|
>I am not a DKIM implementer, and speak as a user. False positives and
|
|
>negatives debase the value of the signatures. I expletive expletive mind
|
|
>that debasement, and I don't see that the spec forbids my opinion.
|
|
|
|
It looks like we're now at the point where everyone can have his own
|
|
opinions, but not his own facts. There are detailed specs for DKIM,
|
|
and it works the way it works. If you don't find that DKIM, as
|
|
defined, is useful to you, that's fine, you don't have to use it.
|
|
|
|
R's,
|
|
John
|
|
|