33 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
33 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From stujenerin at aol.com Mon Feb 11 15:32:33 2013
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Stuart Brandt <stujenerin@aol.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:50 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Clarification on RFC 6851
|
|
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzyscD572nJXsZOypjLToGP1n6sMLif+68at58rQe4xbfA@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
References: <51129513.5080905@aol.com> <1360342514.3230.53.camel@hurina>
|
|
<1360356362.25348.140661188777389.5DDC322F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
|
|
<85789225-4185-487E-B971-4783437732EB@iki.fi>
|
|
<CAKHUCzyscD572nJXsZOypjLToGP1n6sMLif+68at58rQe4xbfA@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <51197F91.8050604@aol.com>
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the good discussion. The scenario we're looking to cover is
|
|
indeed the case Timo hit on - non-recoverable failure of some system
|
|
component while processing an excessively large set of ids.
|
|
|
|
I'll keep monitoring to see if more clarify comes, but for now we're
|
|
going to proceed with the approach Dave outlined below.
|
|
|
|
- Stuart
|
|
|
|
On 2/8/13 4:16 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
|
|
> My take:
|
|
>
|
|
> Say NO if no messages were moved. (For whatever reason).
|
|
>
|
|
> Say OK if some were. (Typically all extant messages in the range).
|
|
>
|
|
> Rationale: You need to put in response codes in various places; it's not
|
|
> clear to me you can put a HIGHESTMODSEQ in a NO response.
|
|
>
|
|
|