39 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
39 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext
From: aa8vb at yahoo.com (Randall Hopper)
|
|
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 14:01:37 -0400
|
|
Subject: .pyo's without .pyc's?
|
|
Message-ID: <19990526140137.A66609@vislab.epa.gov>
|
|
X-UID: 1865
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to cook a minimalist Python install, and I find that python -O
|
|
won't run without .pyc's in-place, even when there are pyo's.
|
|
|
|
I thought pyc's were the straight-compiled version, pyo's were the
|
|
optimized version, and they were independent. Is this correct?
|
|
|
|
To be specific:
|
|
|
|
Python-1.5.2 > ff 'os.*'
|
|
./lib/python1.5/os.pyo
|
|
./lib/python1.5/os.pyc
|
|
|
|
Python-1.5.2 > python
|
|
Python 1.5.2 (#2, May 26 1999, 12:25:54) [C] on irix646-n32
|
|
Copyright 1991-1995 Stichting Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam
|
|
>>> ^D
|
|
|
|
Python-1.5.2 > find . -name '*.pyc' | xargs rm
|
|
|
|
Python-1.5.2 > python -O
|
|
'import exceptions' failed; use -v for traceback
|
|
Warning! Falling back to string-based exceptions
|
|
|
|
Trying to run a python script with -O fails on other modules (os for example).
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Randall Hopper
|
|
aa8vb at yahoo.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|