28 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
28 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext
From: achrist at easystreet.com (Al Christians)
|
|
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 23:00:07 -0800
|
|
Subject: string.join() vs % and + operators
|
|
References: <37054490.E79ADCC9@easystreet.com> <000001be7d92$ea8da080$879e2299@tim>
|
|
Message-ID: <3705BC77.E2C4EA8B@easystreet.com>
|
|
X-UID: 133
|
|
|
|
Tim Peters wrote :
|
|
|
|
(All kinds of [snipped] insights and outsights)
|
|
|
|
Great stuff, Tim. You are right. Your method boosts speed by
|
|
a factor of 5 over the fastest of my 3 methods, which already looked
|
|
to be fast enough not to worry about. In the applications I'm looking
|
|
at, building records from a few dozen fields each and then writing them
|
|
out to indexed files, the record building should take much less time
|
|
than the I/O and record manager. So, no matter how fast or slow
|
|
Python is compared to brand X, the internal processing will be pretty
|
|
insignificant as a part of the total run time.
|
|
|
|
Does-the-next-Python-book-tell-how-to-finish-a-message-so-that-the-reader's-IQ-equals-their-percentage-of-comprehension?
|
|
|
|
Al
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|