wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095090.22820.mbox:2,S

40 lines
1.8 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From guenther+imap at sendmail.com Wed Nov 18 13:02:53 2009
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Philip Guenther <guenther+imap@sendmail.com>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:43 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] wildcards in other users' namespace
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.0911181212090.244@hsinghsing.panda.com>
References: <2134052040.817.1258573414683.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
<1258574152.3022.695.camel@timo-desktop>
<alpine.OSX.2.00.0911181212090.244@hsinghsing.panda.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSO.2.00.0911181248280.8115@vanye.sendmail.com>
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Mark Crispin wrote:
> Also, I can think of a case where "accessible" and "published" should be
> very different. The fact that something can be listed does not mean
> that it should be published.
...
> Should these mailboxes be published to the world due to the anyone
> rights, and thus show up in everybody's list of mailboxes? Or, as I
> contend, just to those who know to look in the mrc-class account?
Wasn't that the intent of the distinction between +l and +r? A mailbox
that is +r-l can be selected if you can enter its name. What you're
talking about here is some finer granularity within LIST/LSUB, where
'broader' operations such as
tag LIST "" *
require more than +l on some classes of mailboxes for them to be returned,
or maybe that 'narrower' operations such as
tag LIST "" /Users/mrc/%
require less than +l.
I guess the problem with +r-l is that it is dependent on client support
for directly entering mailbox names and that is apparently not something
someone can count on. In order to design a fix, what *can* be depended
on? The ability of a client to show that /Users/mrc exists at all and
peek into it with something like that last LIST above? More? Less?
Philip Guenther