wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095245.22807.mbox:2,S

29 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From mrc+imap at panda.com Wed Jun 23 09:21:07 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc+imap@panda.com>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:45 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Handle failures during STORE command execution
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimuPuKtomDd6kyvXLkofyQyShbDxRDUZLaeWwQ6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimu9HE_yXxlM9Zy6yNhvmgoOW3Xlj3aDQmCBDDL@mail.gmail.com>
<30462.1277309118.168996@puncture>
<AANLkTimuPuKtomDd6kyvXLkofyQyShbDxRDUZLaeWwQ6@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1006230919010.266@hsinghsing.panda.com>
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010, Norman Maurer wrote:
> Ok now we I have different answers :( I understand the Problem with
> SILENT, but not See why its the Case otherwise....
The SILENT option in STORE is used when you don't care about knowing what
happened.
However, in most cases the question is moot since yours would probably be
the first server that has a "some but not others" STORE result. It would
be better to keep it moot by abolishing that possibility.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.