wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095217.22807.mbox:2,S

43 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From snowjn at aol.com Tue Jun 15 14:03:25 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: John Snow <snowjn@aol.com>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:44 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] MOVE is a pipeline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1006151352180.662@hsinghsing.panda.com>
References: <1372616189.4386.1276624386644.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com> <1276626345.2916.50.camel@kurkku.sapo.corppt.com> <484642146.4458.1276626832297.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com> <4C17CBDA.6070604@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
<4C17D434.5080807@aol.com> <1962E314-5BC3-4A09-B8A2-3C6104C09161@gmail.com>
<alpine.OSX.2.00.1006151352180.662@hsinghsing.panda.com>
Message-ID: <4C17EA9D.7080201@aol.com>
Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Dan Keen wrote:
>> In regard to MSN in general, it is still very useful for initial
>> synchronization. We use it every time for that (could go away with
>> CONTEXT=SORT), but then rely upon UID for mutating messages.
>
> I find MSNs to be incredibly useful. The arguments to abolish MSNs seem
> mostly to be based upon lack of understanding of how and why they are
> useful.
>
I wish you would stop doing that. Everytime someone questions the
status quo, you
reply that they must be doing so because they just don't understand.
I understand the MSN are useful. But I also see where they cause
problems. So, I
asked the question of how anyone else deals with that problem.
> -- Mark --
>
> http://panda.com/mrc
> Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
> Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
> _______________________________________________
> Imap-protocol mailing list
> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
> http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20100615/1f5bbcbe/attachment.html>