36 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
36 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From tss at iki.fi Tue Mar 20 17:33:31 2007
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:38 2018
|
|
Subject: IMAP Wiki [was: Re: [Imap-protocol] IMAP features: which
|
|
clients use them?]
|
|
In-Reply-To: <07E59C2E-717C-4CD3-A668-6059C9F3AC0D@goodserver.com>
|
|
References: <07Mar20.114847pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
|
|
<20070320133052.S8455@orthanc.ca>
|
|
<07Mar20.133147pst."57996"@synergy1.parc.xerox.com>
|
|
<1174428749.1318.94.camel@hurina>
|
|
<07E59C2E-717C-4CD3-A668-6059C9F3AC0D@goodserver.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <1174437211.1318.113.camel@hurina>
|
|
|
|
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 19:52 -0400, David Rauschenbach wrote:
|
|
> Or, even easier, start and maintain an "imap protocol" topic on
|
|
> Wikipedia.
|
|
|
|
Easier perhaps, but is Wikipedia the right place for such detailed
|
|
information? At least I have a feeling that if I started addings tens of
|
|
new pages about all kinds of things more or less related to IMAP, they'd
|
|
soon get deleted. But I haven't bothered to read Wikipedia's policies so
|
|
I don't know really.
|
|
|
|
If Wikipedia allowed it, I'm still not sure if it's such a good idea.
|
|
Possibly too many people/bots breaking the pages, more or less
|
|
intentionally.
|
|
|
|
-------------- next part --------------
|
|
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
|
|
Name: signature.asc
|
|
Type: application/pgp-signature
|
|
Size: 196 bytes
|
|
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
|
|
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20070321/7f036302/attachment.sig>
|