wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095145.22914.mbox:2,S

26 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From MRC at CAC.Washington.EDU Wed May 30 11:52:47 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <MRC@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:39 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Vista Mail doesn't handle \NoSelect mailboxes?
In-Reply-To: <20070530113546.Q27473@orthanc.ca>
References: <alpine.OSX.0.99.0705301048240.11683@pangtzu.panda.com>
<20070530113546.Q27473@orthanc.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.0.99.0705301146290.5388@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
The underlying problem is that clients are subscribing at all. I have yet
to hear any justification for ANY client to subscribe ANY name without
explicit user instruction; much less the practice of doing a * LIST,
subscribing all the returned names, and then only using LSUB from then on.
I have not heard of any demand in the NNTP world that a NNTP UA be able to
subscribe to comp and comp.mail in order to be able to access
comp.mail.imap and comp.mail.misc.
-- Mark --
http://staff.washington.edu/mrc
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
Si vis pacem, para bellum.