42 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
42 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From dave at cridland.net Wed Jun 21 04:05:48 2006
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:37 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Re: [lemonade] Notifications for multiple devices
|
|
per user
|
|
In-Reply-To: <B25B894D-F749-46C1-8DCC-655B6FAB3823@orthanc.ca>
|
|
References: <0FA975F2D8295A448BE3ADC16124465754DC92@esebe199.NOE.Nokia.com>
|
|
<666.1150807794.041102@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
|
|
<p06300018c0bdecb8b35e@[192.168.1.13]>
|
|
<B25B894D-F749-46C1-8DCC-655B6FAB3823@orthanc.ca>
|
|
Message-ID: <1736.1150887949.021000@JOHN>
|
|
|
|
On Wed Jun 21 07:14:38 2006, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
|
|
> Which leads me to conclude we desperately need a "Doh! Don't Do
|
|
> IMAP Trash This Way, And Here's Why" RFC. Written in little tiny
|
|
> syllables, with a lot of pictures.
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
Well, I basically agree, so whilst I've not done the pictures, I've
|
|
done my best to find and document the reasons why trash mailboxes are
|
|
a bad idea on IMAP. Strangely, while thinking about them, I found a
|
|
couple more (such as interaction with shared mailboxes, and reliance
|
|
on UIDPLUS for any reasonable efficiency).
|
|
|
|
See
|
|
http://svn.dave.cridland.net/svn/ietf-drafts/draft-cridland-imap-trash.xml
|
|
for some XML2RFC source, or temporarily
|
|
http://dave.cridland.net/draft-cridland-imap-trash.txt
|
|
|
|
I suggest that discussion of this, if anyone feels it's worthwhile,
|
|
should probably take place on the IMAP protocol list, rather than
|
|
here.
|
|
|
|
Dave.
|
|
--
|
|
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@cridland.net - xmpp:dwd@jabber.org
|
|
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
|
|
- http://dave.cridland.net/
|
|
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
|
|
|