21 lines
748 B
Plaintext
21 lines
748 B
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no Sun Jul 22 23:24:32 2007
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:40 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Unordered FETCH replies
|
|
In-Reply-To: <1185164783.25618.157.camel@hurina>
|
|
References: <1185164783.25618.157.camel@hurina>
|
|
Message-ID: <SiUoOH/TOnCUwgNjSV1qDA.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
|
|
|
|
Timo Sirainen writes:
|
|
> Has anyone tried how badly clients would break if FETCH didn't send
|
|
> replies ordered by the sequence number?
|
|
|
|
Yes, and no breakage. Clients break on many things they should handle
|
|
(try sending lowercase OK/NO/BAD ;) but that one seems fine.
|
|
|
|
(We changed to strict increasing order later because of testing constraints.)
|
|
|
|
Arnt
|
|
|