wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095112.22772.mbox:2,S

30 lines
1.0 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From mrc+imap at panda.com Thu May 26 14:34:43 2011
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc+imap@panda.com>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:46 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] History question.
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSO.2.00.1105261346420.31737@morgaine.smi.sendmail.com>
References: <4DDEA412.6030305@aol.com>
<alpine.BSO.2.00.1105261253510.31737@morgaine.smi.sendmail.com>
<4DDEB7EB.2090508@aol.com>
<alpine.BSO.2.00.1105261346420.31737@morgaine.smi.sendmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1105261422440.973@hsinghsing.panda.com>
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Philip Guenther wrote:
> IMAP message data/metadata processing is basically a cache-fill/coherency
> algorithm
Yes. That is the entire point of IMAP.
> I take it you don't like that design.
The IMAP3 debacle was because a certain person did not. The years pass,
and some things never change.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.