wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095107.22914.mbox:2,S

47 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From tss at iki.fi Mon May 21 04:12:44 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:39 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] LIST + STATUS
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSO.4.64.0705210402190.19541@skarrin.mho.net>
References: <1179521035.32181.1029.camel@hurina>
<Pine.BSO.4.64.0705210402190.19541@skarrin.mho.net>
Message-ID: <1179745964.32181.1398.camel@hurina>
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 04:02 -0600, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>
> > Are there any drafts / non-standard implementations for returning
> > mailbox list and STATUS replies for multiple mailboxes with a single
> > command? Such as:
> >
> > 1 LIST () "" "%" RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN MESSAGES))
>
> What problem are you trying to solve?
I'm mostly thinking about these webmails that open a new connection for
each page refresh, but it would save a roundtrip with all clients when
they start up.
> Making it easier for a client to
> poll a large number of mailboxes is only a good idea if we want to
> encourage polling for changes. Instead of doing that, shouldn't we work
> towards providing a way for the client to request notifications from the
> server for particular mailbox events? That's the direction the lemonade
> working group is working on, as described in at least these
> internet-drafts:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-lemonade-msgevent-02.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gulbrandsen-imap-notify-03
Yes, Arnt already mentioned NOTIFY. I'd be happy with that too if it
just provided a way to get UNSEEN (and possibly RECENT) counters.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20070521/8df4acaf/attachment.sig>