wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095105.22893.mbox:2,S

33 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From mrc at CAC.Washington.EDU Wed Oct 24 12:16:18 2007
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:40 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] STATUS on a \NoSelect mailbox
In-Reply-To: <32551.1193249693.354094@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
References: <1289589251.146651193229245957.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
<32551.1193249693.354094@peirce.dave.cridland.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.0.9999.0710241213210.10639@pangtzu.panda.com>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Dave Cridland wrote:
> That [Gmail] heirarchy point shouldn't be listed here - as Mark says, it's
> not a mailbox, therefore shouldn't match.
>
> It should be returned for LIST "" "%", but not LIST "" "*".
I disagree. It depends upon the semantics of the underlying mail store.
In some mail stores, such as Cyrus, there is no such physical object as a
"directory" (which is typically what a \NoSelect name is); that is, a
bucket that holds mailboxes and other directories. In others, such as the
ones typically exported by UW, there is such a physical object.
IMAP does NOT, repeat NOT!! dictate the semantics of the server's mail
store; rather, it provides a means to export the mail store's semantics.
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.