wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095104.22756.mbox:2,S

39 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From brong at fastmail.fm Tue Nov 15 00:48:42 2011
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:47 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] SELECT/EXAMINE clarification of UNSEEN
In-Reply-To: <4EC1A0A5.8051.EFC2A39@David.Harris.pmail.gen.nz>
References: <C61A1BDF-03DD-4ED9-BFCA-C6183F07DD3E@mac.com>,
<alpine.OSX.1.10.1111141446070.8578@rastawifi.orthanc.ca>,
<1321311798.30750.140660998918417@webmail.messagingengine.com>
<4EC1A0A5.8051.EFC2A39@David.Harris.pmail.gen.nz>
Message-ID: <1321346922.6321.140660999083661@webmail.messagingengine.com>
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:13 PM, "David Harris" <David.Harris@pmail.gen.nz> wrote:
> When you wake up and get back onto this, one more small correction:
Yeah, it's fine for you. You already live in tomorrow!
> If there are any unseen messages in the mailbox, an UNSEEN
> response MUST be sent, if not it MUST be omitted.
>
> We may as well be consistent with our MUSTs.
Thanks for catching my late-night messup. Indeed. MUST keep our MUSTs
in line!
I also re-ordered the paragraphs so the "what to do when writing a server"
parts were together before the "what clients have to do if it's not there".
Submitted:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3501&eid=3032
Bron.
--
Bron Gondwana
brong@fastmail.fm