19 lines
746 B
Plaintext
19 lines
746 B
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From dkarp at zimbra.com Sat Dec 1 12:28:33 2007
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Dan Karp <dkarp@zimbra.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:41 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] EXPUNGE on a multi-accessed mailbox with unknown
|
|
\Deleted messages
|
|
Message-ID: <633892787.3851196540913222.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
|
|
|
|
Let's say we have two clients. Both SELECT the same mailbox.
|
|
|
|
Client 1 is sitting there inactive when client 2 does an APPEND to the
|
|
selected mailbox and a subsequent STORE +FLAGS \Deleted on the newly-appended
|
|
message. Client 1 then does an EXPUNGE without having been alerted about the
|
|
new message.
|
|
|
|
Should the new message be silently expunged (with no untagged EXPUNGE) or
|
|
should it be skipped by the EXPUNGE?
|
|
|