wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095096.22866.mbox:2,S

22 lines
885 B
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From lyndon at orthanc.ca Thu Jul 10 00:34:27 2008
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:42 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] IMAP server mail transfer simulation
In-Reply-To: <E7541240-67BA-4AD4-AFD0-644E597DB5DC@iki.fi>
References: <56b1f8870807080802p4bea379bi5185e9aff1b33585@mail.gmail.com>
<744A41DC-676F-45EC-B033-C193D165CF6F@orthanc.ca>
<E7541240-67BA-4AD4-AFD0-644E597DB5DC@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <4653BDE1-623F-4B43-B238-EC60827B0C7A@orthanc.ca>
On 2008-Jul-10, at 00:08 , Timo Sirainen wrote:
> I know that at least Thunderbird has a timeout that's something like
> 30 seconds. My server nowadays keeps sending untagged OKs to client
> every 15 seconds if some command processing is taking longer.
And how is your server going to scale to every fucked up client
implementation on the planet?