21 lines
870 B
Plaintext
21 lines
870 B
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From dkarp at zimbra.com Sun Jun 1 13:24:34 2008
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Dan Karp <dkarp@zimbra.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:42 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Proxy IP forwarding
|
|
In-Reply-To: <461F5E4A-6B12-4CAB-AFA6-D5CBABF0D7B6@iki.fi>
|
|
Message-ID: <882332291.21641212351874331.JavaMail.root@dogfood.zimbra.com>
|
|
|
|
> That sounds interesting, although it kind of violates a MUST NOT in
|
|
> the ID spec:
|
|
>
|
|
> > Implementations MUST NOT make operational changes based on the data
|
|
> > sent as part of the ID command or response. The ID command is for
|
|
> > human consumption only, and is not to be used in improving the
|
|
> > performance of clients or servers.
|
|
|
|
All we're doing is including the IP in log entries, so I think we're
|
|
OK in that regard. But bending that rule in the case where access is
|
|
only through a proxy doesn't seem very bad.
|
|
|