wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095080.22701.mbox:2,S

25 lines
778 B
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From lyndon at orthanc.ca Tue Nov 27 15:59:17 2012
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:49 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Combining LITERAL+ and BINARY
In-Reply-To: <1354059359.2844.26.camel@innu>
References: <f99afad3-282b-4ab6-a576-330978724819@flaska.net>
<1354059359.2844.26.camel@innu>
Message-ID: <3DFB419C-6894-4703-BBB4-F156DF0B89DB@orthanc.ca>
On 2012-11-27, at 3:35 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> It's not defined, so I don't think clients can legally use their
> combination.. Although Dovecot supports the obvious way of combining
> them: ~{n+}
And I consider that a legitimate operation.
I'm planning to push an updated BINARY RFC, and I'll make sure this case is called out.
--lyndon