33 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
33 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no Tue Nov 10 02:51:15 2009
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:43 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] "k" right in IMAP ACLs
|
|
In-Reply-To: <4AF93685.1050801@isode.com>
|
|
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.0911092020290.72789@hsinghsing.panda.com>
|
|
<2EEFAD8A-EA31-43FE-932D-ADFA5148786E@iki.fi>
|
|
<4AF93685.1050801@isode.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <vz6RLt7axrkW0mogHa2J9A.md5@lochnagar.gulbrandsen.priv.no>
|
|
|
|
Alexey Melnikov writes:
|
|
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
|
|
>> On Nov 9, 2009, at 11:47 PM, Mark Crispin wrote:
|
|
>>> What do clients that implement IMAP ACL expect from the "k" right?
|
|
>> I'm not aware of any other clients than Mulberry that really supports
|
|
>> ACLs. I don't know what it expects.
|
|
> There are several clients supporting read-only ACLs, e.g. Thunderbird.
|
|
|
|
My impression (just from reading server logs) is that read-only is far
|
|
from unheard. One of the webmail thingies is the only I can recall that
|
|
does read-write.
|
|
|
|
Makes sense, too: It's easy to send a MYRIGHTS command and use the
|
|
result to enable/disable e.g. a "create mailbox" button or menu entry,
|
|
and much harder to write an edit dialog.
|
|
|
|
Now that I think about it, if a client does that, it may never run into
|
|
the corner case that started the thread.
|
|
|
|
Arnt
|
|
|