30 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
30 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From lyndon at orthanc.ca Tue Jul 7 14:18:27 2009
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:42 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] A survey of Spam-related keyword usage by IMAP
|
|
clients.
|
|
Message-ID: <1247001507.8602.109.camel@legolas.orthanc.ca>
|
|
|
|
It's time to get a current view of how IMAP clients are using keywords
|
|
to manage spam. If you are a client author I would appreciate it if you
|
|
could take a moment to send me a note describing which keywords your
|
|
client uses for spam-related processing, and what each of the keywords
|
|
signifies. If your client does not use keywords for this purpose, that's
|
|
valuable information, too, as is a breakdown of functionality by
|
|
software version number if there are significant differences. (If you
|
|
use non-keyword facilities to manage spam feel free to include a short
|
|
description of your methods if you think the info might be relevant.)
|
|
|
|
I'm primarily interested in getting authoritative data from the client
|
|
authors, but others should feel free to chime in with deployment-based
|
|
experience of related keyword usage, but please indicate the source of
|
|
your comments (e.g. deployment experience, source code examination).
|
|
|
|
I will summarize the responses to the imap-ext list in a couple of weeks
|
|
(or sooner if the response rate dictates.)
|
|
|
|
--lyndon
|
|
|
|
|