wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095071.22804.mbox:2,S

24 lines
1.2 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From tss at iki.fi Fri Jul 9 20:33:05 2010
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:45 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] folding/encoding of subject in ENVELOPE
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1007091924300.2580@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
References: <4C37C781.5060700@sun.com>
<FCB729DF-4574-4EA5-BA6C-B21F5B67B9D1@iki.fi>
<alpine.BSF.2.00.1007091831130.49338@legolas.orthanc.ca>
<alpine.WNT.2.00.1007091852190.2580@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
<0D64214F-14CE-43EB-AFC8-9E00DE63EC7F@iki.fi>
<alpine.WNT.2.00.1007091924300.2580@Shimo-Tomobiki.Panda.COM>
Message-ID: <23D24327-5E0D-4868-875C-B5CEFF8A3CE3@iki.fi>
On 10.7.2010, at 4.25, Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jul 2010, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> I'm looking forward to RFC 5738bis.
>
> Better, get rid of RFC 5738 and replace it with something that isn't a
> piece of crap.
Kind of why I'm looking forward to it. 5738 is way too complex. But since we're talking about it, what's your opinion on what stuff it should convert to UTF8? Mailbox names is simple enough, ENVELOPE/BODY/BODYSTRUCTURE should be fine too, but I'm less sure about downloading/saving the actual headers/body.