wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095067.22641.mbox:2,S

31 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From jkt at flaska.net Thu Mar 20 18:11:03 2014
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Kundr=E1t?= <jkt@flaska.net>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:52 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] IMAP SUBMIT Extension, take two
In-Reply-To: <1395341331.29069.96929213.1F949AAB@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <5f20eeec-c84b-4395-b89b-dfc243d9c465@flaska.net>
<66E46BE7-0C45-4EFD-B18F-5A6959AADAC4@gmail.com>
<db2cac03-876f-4966-bf1f-1a7f8d9f4536@flaska.net>
<219fd97c-e1fd-48e4-b8ae-fcf96537a9bb@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
<1395341331.29069.96929213.1F949AAB@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <39b431a9-93a6-42b1-9cbe-5788d5958f43@flaska.net>
On Thursday, 20 March 2014 19:48:51 CEST, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> But now we're proposing a state transition from "UNSENT" to "SENT" - and
I
> strongly believe that rates a readable change on the server, either a
flag
> or a standard annotation name. All I think it needs is a transition from
> "no flag present" to "\Sent" flag present, or $Sent if \Sent is
considered
> too impossible to add at this stage of the game.
Any particular reason why sticking with $Submitted [1] is not OK?
[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5550#section-5.10
--
Trojit?, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/