52 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
52 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From derek.diget+imap-protocol at wmich.edu Fri Jan 13 08:36:12 2012
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Derek Diget <derek.diget+imap-protocol@wmich.edu>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:47 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] which IMAP servers support support SASL
|
|
authorization vs. authentication ID?
|
|
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1201130725430.38441@hsinghsing.panda.com>
|
|
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1201130725430.38441@hsinghsing.panda.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.62.1201131116380.3388@spaz.oit.wmich.edu>
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Jan 13, 2012 at 07:44 -0800, Mark Crispin wrote:
|
|
=>I have been tasked to identify which IMAP servers support the SASL concept
|
|
=>of authorization vs. authentication ID and if it is suitable to allow
|
|
=>impersonation; that is to proxy to various user accounts.
|
|
=>
|
|
=>I have the following data:
|
|
=>
|
|
=>Panda IMAP: Yes
|
|
=> ;; Authenticated userids in system group "mailadm" may authorize
|
|
=> ;; to any other userid.
|
|
=>
|
|
=>UW IMAP: Yes, in newer versions
|
|
=> ;; Same as Panda
|
|
=>
|
|
=>
|
|
=>Probably yes, but not sure and need details:
|
|
=>
|
|
=>Cyrus:
|
|
=>Dovecot:
|
|
=>Communigate Pro:
|
|
=>Sendmail:
|
|
=>Zimbra:
|
|
|
|
Non-Authoritative answer as I am just a admin/user, but
|
|
|
|
Sun's Communication Suite, now know as Oracle Communications Messaging
|
|
Exchange Server seems to per
|
|
|
|
<https://wikis.oracle.com/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=15467378>
|
|
|
|
|
|
(We use the non-standard PROXYAUTH command with the imapsync perl script
|
|
for mailbox migrations, etc.)
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
***********************************************************************
|
|
Derek Diget Office of Information Technology
|
|
Western Michigan University - Kalamazoo Michigan USA - www.wmich.edu/
|
|
***********************************************************************
|
|
|