wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095050.22749.mbox:2,S

37 lines
993 B
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From mrc+imap at panda.com Fri Jan 13 07:44:13 2012
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Mark Crispin <mrc+imap@panda.com>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:47 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] which IMAP servers support support SASL
authorization vs. authentication ID?
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1201130725430.38441@hsinghsing.panda.com>
I have been tasked to identify which IMAP servers support the SASL concept
of authorization vs. authentication ID and if it is suitable to allow
impersonation; that is to proxy to various user accounts.
I have the following data:
Panda IMAP: Yes
;; Authenticated userids in system group "mailadm" may authorize
;; to any other userid.
UW IMAP: Yes, in newer versions
;; Same as Panda
Probably yes, but not sure and need details:
Cyrus:
Dovecot:
Communigate Pro:
Sendmail:
Zimbra:
-- Mark --
http://panda.com/mrc
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.