37 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
37 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From brong at fastmail.fm Wed Apr 4 01:06:26 2012
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:48 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Question about FETCH command
|
|
In-Reply-To: <4F7B8913.4060308@earthlink.net>
|
|
References: <1328732126.32086.140661033971485@webmail.messagingengine.com>
|
|
<201202090820.28260.thomas@koch.ro> <4F337E61.5040702@qbik.com>
|
|
<20120209112411.GB29734@launde.brong.net>
|
|
<4F7B8913.4060308@earthlink.net>
|
|
Message-ID: <20120404080626.GA5317@launde.brong.net>
|
|
|
|
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 06:34:43PM -0500, Rick Sanders wrote:
|
|
> I'm working with an IMAP server which gives errors in response to
|
|
> what seem to me to be valid FETCH commands.
|
|
|
|
Totally not replying to you here, but here's a fine example of why
|
|
THREAD=REFERENCES is broken in the real world. You replied to an
|
|
existing message, changed the subject, didn't strip these headers:
|
|
|
|
References: <1328732126.32086.140661033971485@webmail.messagingengine.com>
|
|
<201202090820.28260.thomas@koch.ro> <4F337E61.5040702@qbik.com>
|
|
<20120209112411.GB29734@launde.brong.net>
|
|
In-Reply-To: <20120209112411.GB29734@launde.brong.net>
|
|
|
|
And so you get threaded in a totally different discussion. Yay.
|
|
|
|
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
|
|
rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
|
|
|
|
Not that it's Thunderbird's fault, necessarily. I might suggest to
|
|
them a "you changed the subject, are you sure this is actually a
|
|
reply" type of question be asked...
|
|
|
|
Bron.
|
|
|