wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095044.22729.mbox:2,S

21 lines
663 B
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no Thu May 3 04:48:48 2012
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:48 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Concurrent flag changes
In-Reply-To: <14DB8F84-E3D5-426A-BBF6-5B4746B6E3DF@iki.fi>
References: <14DB8F84-E3D5-426A-BBF6-5B4746B6E3DF@iki.fi>
Message-ID: <4FA270A0.3040003@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
Timo wrote:
> Clients C1 and C2 send:
It can also be connections C1 and C2 by the same client. If it is, C1 is
perfectly aware of what you told C2, and Dovecot is right today and
would be broken by your suggested change.
(IMO STORE FLAGS is a PITA.)
Arnt