43 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
43 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From jkt at flaska.net Tue Mar 10 04:40:28 2015
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Kundr=E1t?= <jkt@flaska.net>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:54 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol]
|
|
=?iso-8859-1?q?If_Crispin_were_creating_IMAP_toda?=
|
|
=?iso-8859-1?q?y_how_would_it_be_different=3F?=
|
|
In-Reply-To: <CAP1qinat-aNSnNgTm+fJyftapwU9RGno=B5z9RVy9T1gA6C97A@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com> <54FBF289.3010202@psaux.com>
|
|
<7164.1425831184@parc.com>
|
|
<1425907661.1215497.237833469.1EDA571D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
|
|
<6506.1425915329@parc.com> <B03452330F6149E180E449A493F28C2B@gmail.com>
|
|
<CAP1qinZdV1LW6XiWfqfk2A+TC6HsYsAWtT-KSffTNdOFqG_Tjw@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
<80feadb5-24d0-4be9-a6d9-7885f422ad07@flaska.net>
|
|
<CAP1qinat-aNSnNgTm+fJyftapwU9RGno=B5z9RVy9T1gA6C97A@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <ef50cd86-59f2-478c-86e8-5f3a00f1d872@flaska.net>
|
|
|
|
On Tuesday, 10 March 2015 12:29:50 CET, Imants Cekusins wrote:
|
|
> My point (well, other than speed, robustness & simplicity) is that
|
|
> with simplifed protocols though we could have more servers, a choice
|
|
> between servers & configurations, supporting multitude of storage
|
|
> backends.
|
|
>
|
|
> Wouldn't it be nice - to choose? eh?
|
|
|
|
I see plenty of choice at e.g. [1].
|
|
|
|
What I suspect is that you might have had bad experience with performance
|
|
of a random mail server, and are drawing conclusion from there. Sure,
|
|
optimizing raw performance of a given protocol is nice (and being done, see
|
|
BDAT and other examples people have mentioned), but maybe the actual
|
|
reasons for slowness are somewhere else but in the live transformation of
|
|
incoming bytestream?
|
|
|
|
Cheers,
|
|
Jan
|
|
|
|
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mail_servers
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Trojit?, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/
|
|
|