26 lines
994 B
Plaintext
26 lines
994 B
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From imap at maclean.com Fri Feb 8 06:50:38 2013
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Pete Maclean <imap@maclean.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:50 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] QRESYNC Questions
|
|
Message-ID: <mailman.11.1528486490.22076.imap-protocol@mailman13.u.washington.edu>
|
|
|
|
I am busy implementing QRESYNC in my server. I have most of the code
|
|
completed but making sense of RFC 5162 has been very taxing on my
|
|
brain and there are several areas where my understanding is
|
|
uncertain. I am likely to have a few questions to raise and hope
|
|
that some folks here will help me out. Let's start with what I
|
|
expect should be an easy one:
|
|
|
|
When a client has not enabled CONDSTORE and sends an ENABLE QRESYNC
|
|
command to a server that advertises QRESYNC capability, should the
|
|
untagged response say "* ENABLED QRESYNC" or "* ENABLED QRESYNC
|
|
CONDSTORE"? My reading of the spec tells me the latter but I observe
|
|
that another server sends the former.
|
|
|
|
Thank you,
|
|
|
|
Pete Maclean
|
|
|
|
|