wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095028.22595.mbox:2,S

36 lines
1.6 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From lyndon at orthanc.ca Mon Mar 9 18:19:50 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:54 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would
it be different?
In-Reply-To: <CAP1qinY-d_fpmfwJ=04GUZhAnkZpPxzwMGfVdn8--4z=tJT5_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com> <54FBF289.3010202@psaux.com>
<7164.1425831184@parc.com>
<1425907661.1215497.237833469.1EDA571D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
<6506.1425915329@parc.com>
<B03452330F6149E180E449A493F28C2B@gmail.com>
<CAP1qinZdV1LW6XiWfqfk2A+TC6HsYsAWtT-KSffTNdOFqG_Tjw@mail.gmail.com>
<7782A916-12BB-488C-BD57-697FDB5D47E2@orthanc.ca>
<CAP1qinY-d_fpmfwJ=04GUZhAnkZpPxzwMGfVdn8--4z=tJT5_w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <FD3DD0E3-BF62-42F8-974E-EC356407D540@orthanc.ca>
On Mar 9, 2015, at 4:44 PM, Imants Cekusins <imantc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is your measurement data and methodology for this available online anywhere?
>
> this is a subjective assessment. Email servers are way too busy for
> what they deliver. I believe
No, it's not. Everything you are claiming can be measured. No belief required.
Do you have measurements to back up your claim? I don't discount it out of hand, but if you can't back it up with proof, I won't believe it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 817 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20150309/f296d2ae/attachment.sig>