31 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
31 lines
1.3 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From arnt at gulbrandsen.priv.no Wed Jan 15 13:27:55 2014
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:51 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Email charset statistics
|
|
In-Reply-To: <CABa8R6vUg2RFxEobH9u+1pBxJ5C7u991EL9es2BBWJ3=ZGWpyw@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
References: <52D5D84D.6070208@verizon.net>
|
|
<6a420a96-0755-48c3-b8d7-f208c6de14a1@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
|
|
<CABa8R6vUg2RFxEobH9u+1pBxJ5C7u991EL9es2BBWJ3=ZGWpyw@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <42241671-b23e-4a3f-9506-b054eb639447@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
|
|
|
|
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:07:45 PM CEST, Brandon Long wrote:
|
|
> Didn't remember the exact rfc and did a quick search to find
|
|
> it. Yes, I meant 6855... which really could use more
|
|
> information on how its different from 5738, as I look at both
|
|
> right now. 6855 just says it obsoletes 5738.
|
|
|
|
I suppose it could do with a bit more.
|
|
|
|
6855 started as 5738 with a random smattering of improvements (I didn't pay
|
|
attention at the start). Then I tried to implement it and protested against
|
|
various brain damage, and in one quick jabber session, 5738bis lost every
|
|
feature I hated. I was so surprised that I'm not sure I remembered to
|
|
mention everything. Then Dave Cridland suggested better quoting, and then
|
|
the RFC was published.
|
|
|
|
What badness do you see in 6855?
|
|
|
|
Arnt
|
|
|