185 lines
6.9 KiB
Plaintext
185 lines
6.9 KiB
Plaintext
MBOX-Line: From nicolson at google.com Tue May 27 13:39:42 2014
|
|
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFtaWUgTmljb2xzb24gKOWAquW/l+aYjik=?= <nicolson@google.com>
|
|
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:52 2018
|
|
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Creating subfolders in Gmail
|
|
In-Reply-To: <5384F3F4.5090507@comaxis.com>
|
|
References: <537FEFE5.4040103@comaxis.com>
|
|
<53801B87.29010.51A00D5@David.Harris.pmail.gen.nz>
|
|
<CACU8CfTUfhSjsym0wayFQOko=8d6_VWercCkzp6HrVXoW-mfSw@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
<5384E40C.3070907@comaxis.com>
|
|
<CACU8CfTk-Ojb5ub1md+GBodkY0j=UebmMd6oMP1CHLUgGFRjQA@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
<5384F3F4.5090507@comaxis.com>
|
|
Message-ID: <CACU8CfQFeSgVxhHXjtguuso7tYUw8wEVMZkRxcoqKxLvo2+UKQ@mail.gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Ah, yes, "Migrated" matches a Gmail system label (like Inbox, Sent, etc),
|
|
and therefore it is aliased to [IMAP]/Migrated in the web interface. Note
|
|
that you can't even create a label named "Migrated" in the web interface;
|
|
you'll get the error, "The label name Migrated is invalid." The same thing
|
|
would happen if your top-level folder were named Sent, Spam, Trash, etc.
|
|
This shouldn't effect how things work in IMAP, but will change how they are
|
|
displayed in the web interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Jeff McKay <jjmckay@comaxis.com> wrote:
|
|
|
|
> It is the second case I am trying to implement, where in the UI, I can
|
|
> see bar nested under foo. That does not appear to work
|
|
> as you stated. Here is the trace of me creating two folders:
|
|
>
|
|
> <send 24>A103 CREATE "Migrated"
|
|
> <recv 17>A103 OK Success
|
|
> <send 43>A104 CREATE "Migrated/BUDGET CALCULATION"
|
|
> <recv 17>A104 OK Success
|
|
> <send 89>A001 APPEND "Migrated/BUDGET CALCULATION" (\Seen) "18-Apr-2014
|
|
> 09:49:00 -0700" {135007}
|
|
> <recv 12>+ go ahead
|
|
>
|
|
> When I get a new list, I see this:
|
|
>
|
|
> * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "Migrated"
|
|
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Migrated/BUDGET CALCULATION"
|
|
>
|
|
> So it would have appeared to work, but, the UI displays only
|
|
> "Migrated/BUDGET CALCULATION". There is also another
|
|
> label called "[IMAP]/Migrated" with nothing in it.
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
> On 5/27/2014 12:40 PM, Jamie Nicolson (???) wrote:
|
|
>
|
|
> I'm not sure what you mean by "single top level folder". "foo/bar" has the
|
|
> hierarchy delimiter in it, so from IMAP's point of view it is a nested
|
|
> folder.
|
|
>
|
|
> If you want to be able to store messages in "foo/bar", but not "foo",
|
|
> you can CREATE foo/ and then CREATE foo/bar. The first CREATE will be a
|
|
> no-op on Gmail, but will succeed with OK. The second CREATE will result in
|
|
> this folder layout:
|
|
>
|
|
> * LIST (\Noselect \HasChildren) "/" "foo"
|
|
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "foo/bar"
|
|
>
|
|
> Now you can COPY and APPEND messages to foo/bar. If you also want to be
|
|
> able to store messages directly in foo, you just have to CREATE foo(without the hierarchy delimiter suffix). You can do this before or after
|
|
> creating "foo/bar". Then you'll have this:
|
|
>
|
|
> * LIST (\HasChildren) "/" "foo"
|
|
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "foo/bar"
|
|
>
|
|
> The web UI displays these two cases differently. In the first case
|
|
> (where foo/bar is selectable but foo is \Noselect), we show "foo/bar" as a
|
|
> standalone label. In the second case (where foo/bar and foo are both
|
|
> selectable folders), we display bar nested under foo. This is just a quirk
|
|
> of the web UI.
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jeff McKay <jjmckay@comaxis.com> wrote:
|
|
>
|
|
>> Yes that is what I get also, sorry for misstating the error message. I
|
|
>> am still unclear though about how to create a folder
|
|
>> with a sub-folder. You said that the correct syntax should be:
|
|
>>
|
|
>> CREATE "foo/bar"
|
|
>>
|
|
>> which creates a single top level folder called "foo/bar". I know that
|
|
>> you want to support being able to create folder names
|
|
>> that contain the hierarchy delimiter, but there seems to be a conflict
|
|
>> here.
|
|
>>
|
|
>>
|
|
>> On 5/27/2014 11:09 AM, Jamie Nicolson (???) wrote:
|
|
>>
|
|
>> I don't see any error message in the Gmail code for "hierarchy character
|
|
>> ignored". When I try to reproduce this, I see something different:
|
|
>>
|
|
>> a create foo/
|
|
>> a OK [CANNOT] Ignoring hierarchy declaration (Success)
|
|
>>
|
|
>> This seems to follow 6.3.3.
|
|
>>
|
|
>>
|
|
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 9:09 PM, David Harris <David.Harris@pmail.gen.nz
|
|
>> > wrote:
|
|
>>
|
|
>>> On 23 May 2014 at 18:03, Jeff McKay wrote:
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> > Has something changed with how Gmail handles the hierarchy character
|
|
>>> > in the CREATE command? I am sure I had this working at one point, but
|
|
>>> > now:
|
|
>>> >
|
|
>>> > CREATE "TopLevelFolder/"
|
|
>>> >
|
|
>>> > generates "NO hierarchy character ignored"
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> The server would appear to be in error. See RFC3501, section 6.3.3 ("The
|
|
>>> Create Command"):
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> If the mailbox name is suffixed with the server's hierarchy
|
|
>>> separator character (as returned from the server by a LIST
|
|
>>> command), this is a declaration that the client intends to create
|
|
>>> mailbox names under this name in the hierarchy. Server
|
|
>>> implementations that do not require this declaration MUST ignore
|
|
>>> the declaration. In any case, the name created is without the
|
|
>>> trailing hierarchy delimiter.
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> This seems pretty unambiguous to me, but no doubt there's an alternative
|
|
>>> reading I haven't considered (there usually is). I assume GMail actually
|
|
>>> *does* support submailboxes (I don't personally use it)?
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> Interestingly, the example for section 6.3.3 is an almost exact match to
|
|
>>> your
|
|
>>> report:
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> Example:
|
|
>>> C: A003 CREATE owatagusiam/
|
|
>>> S: A003 OK CREATE completed
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> Note that there is a reverse condition to this where a server may report
|
|
>>> a
|
|
>>> mailbox with a trailing hierarchy delimiter as part of a LIST response; I
|
|
>>> confess I've never understood exactly what that means (Exchange used to
|
|
>>> do it and may still do so) - Mark Crispin once explained it to me as
|
|
>>> having
|
|
>>> some meaning related to a test for existence, but I couldn't grasp what
|
|
>>> he
|
|
>>> meant.
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> Cheers!
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> -- David --
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> ------------------ David Harris -+- Pegasus Mail ----------------------
|
|
>>> Box 5451, Dunedin, New Zealand | e-mail: David.Harris@pmail.gen.nz
|
|
>>> Phone: +64 3 453-6880 <%2B64%203%20453-6880> | Fax: +64 3
|
|
>>> 453-6612 <%2B64%203%20453-6612>
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> Real newspaper headlines from U.S. papers:
|
|
>>> TRAFFIC DEAD RISE SLOWLY
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>> _______________________________________________
|
|
>>> Imap-protocol mailing list
|
|
>>> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
>>> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
|
|
>>>
|
|
>>
|
|
>>
|
|
>>
|
|
>> _______________________________________________
|
|
>> Imap-protocol mailing listImap-protocol@u.washington.eduhttp://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
|
|
>>
|
|
>>
|
|
>>
|
|
>> _______________________________________________
|
|
>> Imap-protocol mailing list
|
|
>> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
|
|
>> http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
|
|
>>
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
>
|
|
-------------- next part --------------
|
|
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
|
|
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20140527/f63c71e3/attachment.html>
|