wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095025.22623.mbox:2,S

29 lines
818 B
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From rfs9999 at earthlink.net Fri Sep 26 05:38:49 2014
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Rick Sanders <rfs9999@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:53 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Seeking clarity on Gmail "Access for less
secure apps" setting for non XOAuth2 access
In-Reply-To: <CABa8R6se2WefF4q-cFzR2qtU_5_jDL-wioPF+jPmOTdpCaJhtw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5400A146.4020602@mozilla.com>
<CABa8R6se2WefF4q-cFzR2qtU_5_jDL-wioPF+jPmOTdpCaJhtw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <54255E59.6040104@earthlink.net>
Hi,
With Gmail is XOAUTH2 the only login method that is not considered "less
secure"?
For some reason I got the impression that AUTHENTICATE PLAIN was not
considered "less secure".
Thanks
-Rick
--
Rick Sanders
rfs9999@earthlink.net
IMAP Tools http://www.athensfbc.com/imap-tools