wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095020.22595.mbox:2,S

33 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From lyndon at orthanc.ca Mon Mar 9 15:59:19 2015
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:54 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] If Crispin were creating IMAP today how would
it be different?
In-Reply-To: <CAP1qinZdV1LW6XiWfqfk2A+TC6HsYsAWtT-KSffTNdOFqG_Tjw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54FAEB94.4070508@lavabitllc.com> <54FBF289.3010202@psaux.com>
<7164.1425831184@parc.com>
<1425907661.1215497.237833469.1EDA571D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
<6506.1425915329@parc.com>
<B03452330F6149E180E449A493F28C2B@gmail.com>
<CAP1qinZdV1LW6XiWfqfk2A+TC6HsYsAWtT-KSffTNdOFqG_Tjw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7782A916-12BB-488C-BD57-697FDB5D47E2@orthanc.ca>
On Mar 9, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Imants Cekusins <imantc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Current standards (i.e. case insensitive commands, mixture of
> encodings within a single text block, injection of CRLF which is not
> part of the text), complicate interpreting a lot. It also consumes a
> lot of CPU resources - visibly.
Is your measurement data and methodology for this available online anywhere?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 817 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20150309/c6377933/attachment.sig>