wasm-demo/demo/ermis-f/imap-protocol/cur/1600095017.22651.mbox:2,S

49 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext

MBOX-Line: From blong at google.com Thu Dec 5 14:57:52 2013
To: imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
From: Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Date: Fri Jun 8 12:34:51 2018
Subject: [Imap-protocol] Size wrong
In-Reply-To: <CANVPb6s8LbY7FxT5HG+ASs08i1_emf62-5ppgufHCtZMh5DRiA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANVPb6s8LbY7FxT5HG+ASs08i1_emf62-5ppgufHCtZMh5DRiA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABa8R6s1wM9R7VDY4VbrFqyMyV0q3rc-fr-dWHe+vM8xJCwFkw@mail.gmail.com>
Why ask for the size if you're getting the whole data? j/k
Anyways, I'm a bit surprised that it would be wrong in that context, but
yes, they can be off in our implementation. We've been trying to fix all
of our data to prevent it, but the fixes are still ongoing.
If you want to send me the account off-list, I can take a look to see if
its a known issue causing it in this case or not.
Brandon
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Davide Gullo <jazzo72@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm fetching data from Gmail IMAP server and I get this response:
>
> 20293 FETCH (X-GM-MSGID 1345230530776790491 UID 33925 RFC822.SIZE
> *14787* RFC822 {*14985*}
>
> Look at the RFC822.SIZE (14787), it is different from the size in
> RFC822 {14985}.
> Do you see something like that before?
> It could be a bug or I miss something from the IMAP protocol?
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> --
> Davide Gullo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Imap-protocol mailing list
> Imap-protocol@u.washington.edu
> http://mailman2.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/imap-protocol
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman13.u.washington.edu/pipermail/imap-protocol/attachments/20131205/70b3cffa/attachment.html>